Back to Research & Publications Index

J Foot Ankle Surg. 2002 May-Jun;41(3):146-53.

Husain ZS, DeFronzo DJ.

Department of Medicine and Surgery, Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

Two different fixations for treatment of Jones' fracture were tested in bone models and cadaveric specimens to determine the differences in the stability of the constructs. A bicortical 3.5-mm cannulated cortical screw and an intramedullary 4.0-mm partially threaded cancellous screw were tested using physiologic loads with an Instron 8500 servohydraulic tensiometer (Instron Corporation, Canton, MA). In bone models, the bicortical construct (n = 5, 87+/-23 N) showed superior fixation strength (p = .0009) when compared to the intramedullary screw fixation (n = 5, 25+/-13 N). Cadaveric testing showed similar statistical significance (p = .0124) with the bicortical construct (n = 5, 152+/-71 N) having greater load resistance than the intramedullary screw fixation (n = 4, 29+/-20 N). In bone models, the bicortical constructs (23+/-9 N/mm) showed over twice the elastic modulus than the intramedullary screw fixations (9+/-4 N/mm) with statistical significance (p = .0115). The elastic modulus in the cadaveric group showed a similar pattern between the bicortical (19+/-17 N/mm) and intramedullary (9+/-6 N/mm) screw constructs. Analysis of the bicortical screw failure patterns revealed that screw orientation had a critical impact on fixation stability. The more distal the exit site of the bicortical screw was from the fracture site, the greater the load needed to displace the fixation.

Weil Foot & Ankle Institute
(847) 390-7666
Email : info@weil4feet.com
Website : www.weil4feet.com